Why are resource-rich nations amongst the poorest in the world with conditions of living that are at best brutish and cruel? This is one qustion that has endlessed agitated the minds of development economists over the years. And, it sure will many years to come.
Much of this resource-curse is evident in sub-saharan Africa, home to over 500 million people. From Nigeria to Liberia, Sierra Leone to Congo DR, Sudan to Gabon. The resources range from oil and gas to diamond, aptly regarded by Paul Collier as "a guerrilla's best friend", to gold and large forest reserves, among others. But this unwholesome reality is not a wholly African affair. Some economists say it is also prevalent in countries as diverse as Venuezuela, Burma and Russia.
Over the years, however, the case of Nigeria has become very instructive. Regarded as the sixth largest producer of crude oil in the world with a daily production quota of at least 3 million Barrel Per Day, which gives the country over 80 % of its annual revenue, Nigeria consistently gets mentioned on the wrong side of human development indicators of various international agencies.
For instance, Nigeria is almost always ranked "low" in such indexes as primary education, health, poverty reduction, capapcity building, water and sanitation.
In 2003 alone, for example, the World Bank noted that Nigeria generated about $17 billion, much of the revenue coming from oil and gas proceeds, yet when the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) published its World Human Development Report in 2004, Nigeria was placed 177 out of 151 countries studied, with 70% of its 140 million population living on less than a dollar per day and 43 % lacking sanitation and clean water. Besides, its infant mortality rate is to be among the highest in the world. Most recently, it was also reported among the countries that would not meet the Millennium Development Goals.
A recent report by a Canadian lobby group, Africa Canada working with a group of lawyers called Green Advocates on Liberia reechoed the reality in the war-torn West African nation. The report ostensibly inspired by the works of Jeffry Sachs and Paul Collier highlighted the economic dangers facing nations that depend on raw material(resource) for export and concluded that a major reorganisation of the billion dollar worth raw materials sector is imperative if the populace must benefit therefrom.
Such efforts are not even evident in the corruption-ridden oil and gas industry in Nigeria, but there is no denying the need for it in the country. But far more than an inquest into the various raw materials sectors in sub-saharan Africa is the need to improve on the governance structure of resource-rich nations. It is worrying enough that democracies of most resource-rich nations seem accursed, what with a rambustious and conflicted electoral process, poor accountability and opaque system of public administration. Nigeria's last attempt at conducting an election in May 2007 was widely regarded as flawed by both domestic and international observers, and has since become a subject of intense litigation by stakeholders in law courts.
It is no more a guess why poverty seems to subsist in resource-rich nations. Its management by an elite and political leadership that does not owe its ascension to power on popular participation and involvement has been very unhelpful and anti-people.
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This